An Introduction to Cache Invalidation

This general introduction explains cache invalidation concepts. If you are already familiar with cache invalidation, you may wish to skip this chapter.

HTTP Caching Terminology

The client that requests web representations of the application data. This client can be visitor of a website, or for instance a client that fetches data from a REST API.
Also backend application or origin server. The web application that holds the data.
Proxy Server
Also reverse caching proxy. Examples: Varnish, NGINX, Symfony HttpCache.
Time to live (TTL)
Maximum lifetime of some content. Expressed in either an expiry date for the content (the Expires: header) or its maximum age (the max-age and s-maxage cache control directives).
Invalidating a piece of content means telling the proxy server to no longer serve that content to clients. The proxy can choose to either discard the content immediately, or do so when it is next requested. On that next request, the proxy will fetch a fresh copy from the application.

What is Cache Invalidation?

There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things.

– Phil Karlton

The problem

HTTP caching is a great solution for improving the performance of your web application. For lower load on the application and fastest response time, you want to cache content for a long period. But at the same time, you want your clients to see fresh content as soon as there is an update.

Instead of finding some compromise, you can have both with cache invalidation. When application data changes, the application takes care of invalidating its web representation as out-of-date. Although caching proxies may handle invalidation differently, the effect is always the same: the next time a client requests the data, he or she gets a new version instead of the outdated one.


There are three alternatives to cache invalidation.

  1. The first is to expire your cached content quickly by reducing its time to live (TTL). However, short TTLs cause a higher load on the application because content must be fetched from it more often. Moreover, reduced TTL does not guarantee that clients will have fresh content, especially if the content changes very rapidly as a result of client interactions with the application.
  2. The second alternative is to validate the freshness of cached content at every request. Again, this means more load on your application, even if you return early (for instance by using HEAD requests).
  3. The last resort is to not cache volatile content at all. While this guarantees the user always sees changes without delay, it obviously increases your application load even more.

Cache invalidation gives you the best of both worlds: you can have very long TTLs, so when content changes little, it can be served from the cache because no requests to your application are required. At the same time, when data does change, that change is reflected without delay in the web representations.


Cache invalidation has two possible downsides:

  • Invalidating cached web representations when their underlying data changes can be very simple. For instance, invalidate /articles/123 when article 123 is updated. However, data usually is represented not in one but in multiple representations. Article 123 could also be represented on the articles index (/articles), the list of articles in the current year (/articles/current) and in search results (/search?name=123). In this case, when article 123 is changed, a lot more is involved in invalidating all of its representations. In other words, invalidation adds a layer of complexity to your application. This library tries to help reduce complexity, for instance by tagging cached content. Additionally, if you use Symfony, we recommend you use the FOSHttpCacheBundle. which provides additional functionality to make invalidation easier.
  • Invalidation is done through requests to your proxy server. Sending these requests could negatively influence performance, in particular if the client has to wait for them. This library resolves this issue by optimizing the way invalidation requests are sent.

Invalidation Methods

Cached content can be invalidated in three ways. Not all caching proxies support all methods, please refer to proxy specific documentation for the details.


Purge removes content from the proxy server immediately. The next time a client requests the URL, data is fetched from the application, stored in the proxy server, and returned to the client.

A purge removes all variants of the cached content, as per the Vary header.


Fetch the requested page from the backend immediately, even if there would normally be a cache hit. The content is not just deleted from the cache, but is replaced with a new version fetched from the application.

As fetching is done with the parameters of the refresh request, other variants of the same content will not be touched.


Unlike purge, ban does not remove the content from the cache immediately. Instead, a reference to the content is added to a blacklist (or ban list). Every client request is checked against this blacklist. If the request happens to match blacklisted content, fresh content is fetched from the application, stored in the proxy server and returned to the client.

Bans cannot remove content from cache immediately because that would require going through all cached content, which could take a long time and reduce performance of the cache.

The ban solution may seem cumbersome, but offers more powerful cache invalidation, such as selecting content to be banned by regular expressions. This opens the way for powerful invalidation schemes, such as tagging cache entries.